Drawing for MARELLA

USPTO serial 79017507

MARELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288288Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water treatment equipment, namely, water bars for filtering and softening water, [ water coolers, water sparklers for the aeration of water, ] water filters, water purifiers, water purifying apparatus, water purifying units, [ faucet filters, ] water filtration pitchers sold empty and cartridge filtration unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 7, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 1, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 19, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 6, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 6, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 4, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 30, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 14, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 19, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance