Drawing for FCV

USPTO serial 79017553

FCV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275331Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FCV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L KAPLAN & STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal security lock cylinders; metal keys for locks; components of master keyed installations, namely, metal locks, metal keys for locks, metal security lock cylinders, metal ball lock pins, metal drill guards in the nature of metal guards placed inside of the locking cylinder in order to avoid the drilling of the lock by an unauthorized person, and metal wrench guards in the nature of metal guards placed inside of the locking cylinder in order to avoid the drilling of the lock by an unauthorized personSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Electronically or electrically operated cylinders, namely, electronically operated high security lock cylinders; electronically or electrically operated keys, namely, magnetically encoded key cards; components of master keyed installations, namely, electronic or electrically operated locks, high security lock cylinders, and magnetically encoded key cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Technical planning, technical conception, and technical consultancy, namely, design for others in the field of metal security lock cylinders, metal keys for locks, components of master keyed installations, namely, metal locks, metal keys for locks, metal security lock cylinders, metal ball lock pins, metal drill guards in the nature of metal guards placed inside of the locking cylinder in order to avoid the drilling of the lock by an unauthorized person, metal wrench guards in the nature of metal guards placed inside of the locking cylinder in order to avoid the drilling of the lock by an unauthorized person, electronically or electrically operated locks, electronic or electrically operated high security lock cylinders, and electronically or electrically operated keys, namely, magnetically encoded key cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 7, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 2, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jan 8, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance