Drawing for VIRGILIO

USPTO serial 79017603

VIRGILIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275335Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRGILIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Burton

BECK GREENER FULWOOD HOUSE12 FULWOOD PLLONDON WC1V 6HR UNITED KINGDOM,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PERFUMERY, EAU-DE-PARFUM AND TOILET WATERS; SOAPS; DEODORANT PREPARATIONS FOR PERSONAL USE; SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR LOTIONS; SHAVING PREPARATIONS NAMELY AFTER-SHAVE AND PRE-SHAVE LOTIONS AND OILS; BALMS, CREAMS, FOAMS, GELS, LOTIONS AND SOAPS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE AND OILS FOR TOILET PURPOSES; POMANDERS; POTPOURRIS, FRAGRANCED SACHETS FOR DRAWERS, ROOM FRAGRANCES, INCENSESECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 21, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 14, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 14, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance