Drawing for PURO

USPTO serial 79017615

PURO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531098Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett M. Tolpin

BRETT M TOLPIN WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Yams and thread, namely, woolen yams and threadsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
024Textiles, namely, textiles fabrics for clothing articles; bed blankets and tablecloths not of paper; household linen; beach towels, bath towels; tapestries of textile and textile wall hangings; textiles articles of any kind, namely, tablecloths, place-mats, table napkins, textile place mats, tissue handkerchiefs, bed sheets, pillowcases, bedspreads, quiltsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 2, 2015CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Oct 21, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Oct 16, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 16, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 30, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 19, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 12, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 31, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 22, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 22, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Aug 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 20, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance