Drawing for Serial No. 79017650

USPTO serial 79017650

Serial No. 79017650

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194541Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79017650?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY B. SLADKUS

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee and artificial coffee; coffee in the form of crystals; tea and artificial tea; cocoa and artificial cocoa; barley and processed barley; natural and processed herbs for preparing beverages; natural and processed herb extracts not for medical use; sugar and sugar substitutes; pastries; confectionery, namely cakes, chocolates, coffee beans coated with chocolate; ice creams; flavored icesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 2, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance