Drawing for VIP

USPTO serial 79017689

VIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194543Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Georg Seka

J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial mixing devices, namely static or dynamic mixers for installing on a screw extruder for mixing materials used in the production and/or treatment of plastic materials; Industrial mixing devices, namely, static or dynamic mixers for replacing non-return valves of an injection-molding machine; Industrial mixing devices, namely dynamic mixers for synthetic materials, and dynamic mixers for injection molding, extrusion molding and blow molding; and components and spare parts for all the above devicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 21, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 21, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 20, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 20, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance