Drawing for MERULA

USPTO serial 79017710

MERULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258851Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MERULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew N. Fredbeck

Andrew N. Fredbeck FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oils, in particular, virgin olive oilACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Apr 22, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 22, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 22, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
May 22, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 8, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance