USPTO serial 79017729
MTG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3335343Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MTG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
Neil F. Greenblum GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Excavating machines, loading power shovels and machines for earthmoving and public works, namely excavators, motor graders, backhoe loaders, dozers, crawler loaders, skid-steer loaders, wheeled loaders; replacement parts and tools for the aforementioned machines, namely excavator bucket teeth, digger teeth, two part teeth, tooth holders, teeth adapters, metal and polymer locking mechanisms, bucket wear protectors and shroud protectors, tooth adapter fitting systems consisting of teeth, teeth adapters and metal and/or polymer locking mechanisms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |