USPTO serial 79017736
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BHARATI BAKSHANI
BHARATI BAKSHANI LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer and audio apparatus, namely, audio speakers, amplifiers, stereo headphones[ and computer apparatus related to the Internet, namely, computers] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |