Drawing for HEMOCARD VISION

USPTO serial 79017784

HEMOCARD VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220277Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEMOCARD VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Byrne, Reg. No. 28,498

Richard L. Byrne, Reg. No. 28,498 The Webb Law Firm436 Seventh Avenue700 Koppers BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for measuring blood parameters of a patient for use in medical practices for use with medical instruments for measuring hematological and cardiological parameters; computer interfaces, namely, graphical user interface software for use with medical instruments for measuring hematological and cardiological parametersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010Surgical and medical instruments namely, catheters having an interface for measuring blood parameters and impedanceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 19, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 17, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 25, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 25, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance