Drawing for REYMO

USPTO serial 79017827

REYMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REYMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Tricot pullovers, shirts, socks, trousers, nightdresses, jackets, jackets for babies, undershirts, panties, underpants, bathing suits, shoes, caps, gloves, coats, overcoats, waistcoats, underwear for women, bras, t-shirts, blouses, tracksuits, gowns, skirts, dresses, suits, clothing for all infants and childrenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance