USPTO serial 79017880
PROPELLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPELLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Breath freshening sprays; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; scented water; javelle water; lavender water; toilet water; make-up; deodorants for personal use; perfumes; extracts of flowers (perfumes); mint for perfumery; greases for cosmetic purposes; eyebrow pencils; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic preparations for skin care, namely; cosmetic creams, cosmetic milk, beauty masks, lotions for cosmetic purposes, skin whitening creams; hair spray; nail polish; after-shave lotions; hair lotions; oils for perfumes and scents; oils for cleaning purposes; oils for cosmetic purposes; essential oils, namely: essential oils of cedarwood, essential oils of citron, essential oils of lemon, bergamot oil, gaultheria oil, jasmine oil, lavender oil, almond oil, rose oil, badian essence, terpenes (essential oils), mint essence (essential oil); adhesives for cosmetic purposes; almond milk for cosmetic purposes; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; musk (perfumery); soaps, namely: disinfectant soap, deodorant soap, shaving soap, cakes of toilet soap, cakes of soap, medicated soap, antiperspirant soap, soap for foot perspiration, almond soap; false nails; eau de cologne; hydrogen peroxide for cosmetic purposes; lipsticks; pomades for cosmetic purposes; shaving preparations; hair waving preparations; mouth washes, not for medical purposes; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; make-up removing preparations; lacquer-removing preparations; make-up powder; false eyelashes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; potpourris (fragrances); bath salts, not for medical purposes; astringents for cosmetic purposes; eyebrow cosmetics; sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics); hair colorants; neutralizers for permanent waving; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; depilatory preparations, namely: depilatory wax, depilatory cream; cosmetics for animals; mascara; bleaching preparations (decolorants) for cosmetic purposes; antiperspirants (toiletries); talcum power, for toilet use; shampoos; shampoos for pets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |