Drawing for NATIA

USPTO serial 79017903

NATIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3215990Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry H. Tronco

Larry H. Tronco HOLLAND & HART, LLPPO Box 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032[ Beers; ] mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, flavored waters and soda waters [ ; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 8, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 2, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 20, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance