Drawing for Serial No. 79017913

USPTO serial 79017913

Serial No. 79017913

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251936Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79017913?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen T. Olson/Geoffrey D. Aurini

STEPHEN T OLSON / GEOFFREY D AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated rotary tools for cutting by stock removal, namely reamers and drills and their component parts, stands, adapters, mandrills, tips with cutting edge, mechanical extension pieces and adjustment devicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
008Hand-operated rotary tools for cutting by stock removal, namely reamers and their component parts, stands, adapters, tips with cutting edge and extension piecesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Technical consulting in mechanically-operated tools and parts of tools; development and performing of trials for third parties, on mechanically-operated rotary tools for cutting by stock removal and on their component partsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 1, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 1, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 11, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 3, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance