USPTO serial 79017922
DESPERADOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445340Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESPERADOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Nowak
Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; [ mineral and carbonated waters; lemonades, sodas, namely, carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, sherbets, sorbets, milk of almonds, peanut milk, non-alcoholic aperitif sand cocktails, non-alcoholic cider, fruit nectars, ginger ale, non-alcoholic ginger beer, isotonic beverages, lithia water, non-alcoholic malt beer, fruit beverages and fruit juices, tomato juice, vegetable juices, whey beverages, carbonated beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, milk of almonds, fruit drinks, non-alcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic cider, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic fruit extracts, fruit nectars, ginger ale, ginger beer, isotonic beverages, lemonades, lithia water, malt beer, peanut milk, sarsaparilla, seltzer water, sherbets, sodas, namely, carbonated beverages, sorbets, tomato juice, vegetable juices, whey beverages, pastilles for effervescing beverages, namely, soft drinks, powders for effervescing beverages, namely, soft drinks, essences for making beverages, namely, soft drinks; unfermented grape must, extracts of hops for making beer; syrups for beverages, lemonades, and soft drinks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | [ Alcoholic beverages, namely, rum, tea-based alcoholic beverages; distilled beverages, namely, spirits; alcoholic essences and extracts; wines, mulled wines; aperitifs, pre-pared alcoholic and prepared wine cocktails; liqueurs, namely, bitters, liqueurs, anise; distilled spirits, potable spirits; liqueurs and alcoholic distilled spirits, namely, digesters; eaux-de-vie; flavored sparkling alcoholic beverages of fruit; hard ciders; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; fruit extracts containing alcohol ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HEINEKEN ENTREPRISE
- Other trademarks owned by HEINEKEN ENTREPRISE
- Other trademarks owned by BRASSERIE FISCHER
- Other trademarks owned by BRASSERIE FISCHER
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named DESPERADOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |