USPTO serial 79017993
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Artarmon NSW 2064, AU
Flovac Vacuum Sewerage Systems Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Flovac Vacuum Sewerage Systems Pty Ltd
Artarmon NSW 2064, AU
Artarmon NSW 2064, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus, installations, equipment, process systems and plants for the removal, collection, storage, filtering, treatment and transportation of fluids, waste water, and sewage by means of vacuum techniques, fluid handling and management, sewage and waste water purification and treatment, namely, water purification units, sewage treatment plants, sewage collection tanks, surge tanks, water treatment equipment, namely, chemical sterilization units; parts, fittings and components, namely, toilets, water filters, gas injectors for disbursing solids and/or liquids for purification and sterilization purposes, separators for the cleaning and purification of air, water purification tanks, vacuum sewer pipes and sensor pipes being parts of sanitary facilities, water traps, plumbing fittings, namely, vacuum interface valves; apparatus and equipment for water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, waste water purification units | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Sewage treatment services; waste and water treatment services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |