USPTO serial 79018006
HAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220281Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia L. Carron
Virginia L. Carron Finnegan901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN INDUSTRY AND SCIENCE; UNPROCESSED ARTIFICIAL RESINS FOR THE POLYMERS PROCESSING INDUSTRY, UNPROCESSED PLASTICS IN ALL FORMS; FIRE EXTINGUISHING COMPOSITIONS; ADHESIVES FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE; TALC AND MAGNESIUM SILICATES FOR USE IN INDUSTRY; TALC AND MAGNESIUM SILICATES IN POWDER FORM, IN PELLET FORM IN SLURRY FORM AND IN LIQUID FORM FOR THE INDUSTRY, NAMELY FOR THE POLYMERS INDUSTRY; TALC AND MAGNESIUM SILICATES AS RAW MATERIAL FOR USE TN POLYMERS AND PLASTICS; MIXTURES OF POLYMERS COMPOSITIONS AND TALC AS RAW MATERIAL USED IN MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | [ RUBBER, GUTTA-PERCHA, GUM, MICA AND GOODS MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS AND NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY, PELLETS AND GRANULES FOR USE IN MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS; PLASTICS IN EXTRUDED FORM FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE AND FOR USE IN PRODUCTION ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imerys Talc Belgium
- Other trademarks owned by LUZENAC, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks owned by LUZENAC, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named HAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |