Drawing for PHYTOS

USPTO serial 79018011

PHYTOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242610Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
EVANS, ANDREA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

KLAUS DENZEL ANDREAS HOFMANN PHYTOS GBR LEIBNIZSTRASSE 9NEU ULM FED REP, 89231GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042testing of pharmaceuticals and medical research in the field of natural curesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 28, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 6, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Oct 6, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 27, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Feb 24, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance