Drawing for IMR

USPTO serial 79018013

IMR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233577Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in industry; minerals for use in chemical products used in industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
006full line of common metals and their alloys for use in agriculture and industry; a full line of metal ores for use in industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007full line of machines for use in mining operations, in particular for the extraction and processing of underground wealthSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Technical consulting in the field of raw materials mining operations and the extraction and processing of mineralsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Technical consulting in processing of underground wealthSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
May 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 27, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Sep 28, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance