Drawing for IMMERSIVE WORKSPACE

USPTO serial 79018037

IMMERSIVE WORKSPACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307441Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMMERSIVE WORKSPACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs and software, stored on data carriers for creating interactive virtual reality environments, displays and presentations; computers; projection and input devices, namely data processors, displays and visual reproduction equipment in the nature of computer monitors; mobile multimedia projectors, mobile projection screens; apparatus for recording sound and images; measuring devices and instruments, namely, digitizersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
016printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials in the field of interactive virtual realitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Management and compilation of computerized databases in the field of graphics, texts, images and audiovisual materials and virtual reality technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 11, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 16, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 30, 2007ISIRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 26, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance