USPTO serial 79018043
BOYNQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3405606Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2008
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOYNQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AG Rijnsburg, NL
AG Rijnsburg, NL
AG Rijnsburg, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER, PC1160 SPA ROAD, SUITE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, remote control apparatus for radios, televisions, stereos; electronic agendas, electronic calculators, wake up alarms, video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games, electronic timers, USB hubs; Optical apparatus and instruments for communications, namely, optical transmitters and optical receivers; weighing apparatus and instruments, namely, scales and balances; measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, bevels and digitizers; Signaling apparatus and instruments, namely, bells, processors and whistles; checking apparatus and instruments, namely, balances and porosity analyzers; life-saving apparatus and instruments, namely, rafts; teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, video cameras, audio and video tape players; Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, sensing and signaling devices for measurement and quality control of materials and processing by laser; nautical apparatus and instruments, namely, GPS receivers, inertial navigation receivers; surveying apparatus and instruments, namely, chains and levels; Electric apparatus and instruments, namely, electric apparatus transistors; photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, exposed camera film, exposed slide film, developers, photographic papers, cinematographic apparatus and instruments, namely, projectors and projection screens; Apparatus for recording transmission or reproduction of sound or images; loudspeakers, loudspeaker boxes; computer loudspeakers; portable computer memory cartridges, computer central processing units, interface cards for data processing, computers, computer peripherals; blank computer discs;Computer software for use in database management, use as a spreadsheet, word processing; computer screens; automatic vending machines; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus, namely, card readers; cash registers, calculating machines; fire-extinguishing apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |