Drawing for ZENO

USPTO serial 79018103

ZENO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZENO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Materials for dental prosthetics, included in this class, namely, materials for crowns and bridges for dental use and for oral prophylaxis, in particular discs made from ceramics, discs made from metals, discs made from metal alloys, and discs made from plastics as blanks, all for the fabrication of dental restorations; materials for dentures and dental prostheses, namely, veneer ceramics, frame ceramics; dental restoration compounds of metal, precious metals and dental alloys thereof as well as ceramic masses and plastics for dental restoration use; composite materials for model preparation and model processing composite materials for dental use; modeling materials, in particular waxes for dental use; dental impression materials, duplicating materials, namely, orthodontic alginate for dental impressions; investment materials, namely, materials for repairing dental crowns and bridges and fixing materials for dental use, namely, material for repairing teethSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
007Milling machines and grinding machines for the treatment of ceramics and metal; machine parts, namely, grinding tools for grinding machines and milling tools for milling machines; tool holders and work piece holders for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Electric and electronic apparatus for use in the dental field but not for medical purposes, namely, computer hardware supported scanners, laser supported scanners, camera supported scanners, and scanners; laser and camera supported scanners and computer hardware, all for digital imaging, computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) processing in the dental field, but not used for medical purposes; data processing apparatus for dental use, namely, data processors used in the dental field; computer programs, namely, software stored on data media for use in computer aided design and modeling, computer aided manufacturing and digital imaging in the dental fieldSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
010Dental apparatus and instruments for handling, applying and processing dental ceramics, namely, prosthetic instruments for dental purposes, dental drills, dental hand pieces, and dental mirrors; artificial teeth, dental prostheses, dental crowns, dental bridges, in particular of ceramics and metal ceramicsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Electrically heated furnaces, especially for sintering of ceramic dental partsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 22, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2015WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Jul 29, 2015WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 31, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 31, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 15, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 28, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 28, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 16, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 23, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 23, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 6, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 2, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 2, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 11, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 4, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 4, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 14, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Oct 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance