USPTO serial 79018103
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Materials for dental prosthetics, included in this class, namely, materials for crowns and bridges for dental use and for oral prophylaxis, in particular discs made from ceramics, discs made from metals, discs made from metal alloys, and discs made from plastics as blanks, all for the fabrication of dental restorations; materials for dentures and dental prostheses, namely, veneer ceramics, frame ceramics; dental restoration compounds of metal, precious metals and dental alloys thereof as well as ceramic masses and plastics for dental restoration use; composite materials for model preparation and model processing composite materials for dental use; modeling materials, in particular waxes for dental use; dental impression materials, duplicating materials, namely, orthodontic alginate for dental impressions; investment materials, namely, materials for repairing dental crowns and bridges and fixing materials for dental use, namely, material for repairing teeth | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Milling machines and grinding machines for the treatment of ceramics and metal; machine parts, namely, grinding tools for grinding machines and milling tools for milling machines; tool holders and work piece holders for the aforementioned goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus for use in the dental field but not for medical purposes, namely, computer hardware supported scanners, laser supported scanners, camera supported scanners, and scanners; laser and camera supported scanners and computer hardware, all for digital imaging, computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) processing in the dental field, but not used for medical purposes; data processing apparatus for dental use, namely, data processors used in the dental field; computer programs, namely, software stored on data media for use in computer aided design and modeling, computer aided manufacturing and digital imaging in the dental field | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Dental apparatus and instruments for handling, applying and processing dental ceramics, namely, prosthetic instruments for dental purposes, dental drills, dental hand pieces, and dental mirrors; artificial teeth, dental prostheses, dental crowns, dental bridges, in particular of ceramics and metal ceramics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electrically heated furnaces, especially for sintering of ceramic dental parts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |