CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MUNZ

USPTO serial 79018201

MUNZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronni S. Jillions

RONNI S JILLIONS BROWDY & NEIMARK624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely jellies, jams, milkACTIVE—
030Cocoa, chocolate, chocolate articles namely, chocolate bars, chocolate tablets, chocolate sticks, praline filled figures, confectionery, namely fruit jellies, crystal sugar pieces covered with chocolate, and sugar confectionery, hard-baked pastriesACTIVE—
031Food products, namely fresh fruitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance