Drawing for KINDER DUOBREAK

USPTO serial 79018310

KINDER DUOBREAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237577Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINDER DUOBREAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Jams, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk and cheeseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Beverages made of coffee or tea; cacao or chocolate food beverages not being dairy based or vegetable based; chocolate; chocolate articles, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate cakes, chocolate cookies, chocolate pastes, chocolate topping, chocolate candy eggs and chocolate candies; cereal preparations, namely, sweet and pastry snacks made from cereals or having a cereal filling; pastries and confectionery, namely, candies, wafers, waffles, muffins, cakes and sponge cakes, jam bread, cream bread and bread rolls; flavored ices; ice cream; chewing gumSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Mineral and carbonated waters; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-carbonated fruit flavored drinks containing water; soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; fruit based beverages, vegetable based beverages; syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 31, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 4, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 27, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jan 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 16, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance