Drawing for PULSCENT DIFFUSIVITY ASSESSMENT

USPTO serial 79018339

PULSCENT DIFFUSIVITY ASSESSMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242615Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PULSCENT DIFFUSIVITY ASSESSMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH R. OBERT

KEITH R. OBERT WARE, FRESSOLA, MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5MONROE, CT 06468United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Perfumes; essential oils ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Apparatus for the evaluation of the diffusivity of perfumesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Technological consultation in the field of evaluation of the diffusivity of perfumesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 21, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Dec 11, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 17, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 22, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jun 20, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 20, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Oct 17, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 11, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Oct 11, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 11, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 11, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 7, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Oct 7, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jul 15, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jun 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
May 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance