Drawing for HARMOFREQ

USPTO serial 79018345

HARMOFREQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242616Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMOFREQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

YOSHITAKE KENJI CHIYODA-KUFUJI BLDG2-3, MARUNOUCHI 3-CHOME,TOKYO, 100 0005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Shock absorbers for automobiles; shock absorbers for motorcycles and railroad rolling stockSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Nov 11, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance