Drawing for SN100C

USPTO serial 79018346

SN100C

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194569Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
TANNER,MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SN100C?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak Mehta

Mainak Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLPSuite 2200525 B StreetSan Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Non ferrous metals and their alloys, namely, [ metal alloys for further manufacturing, ] soft solder alloys, and hard solder alloys, [ tin and its alloys ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 30, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 31, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jan 17, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 17, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 17, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 26, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 4, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 10, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 27, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 27, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 11, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Sep 11, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Sep 11, 2008LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Aug 14, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance