USPTO serial 79018364
P.A.P.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P.A.P.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Van Hoozer, Warren N. Williams, Stephen D. Timmons, John M. Collins, Tomas B. Luebbering, Andrew G. Colombo, Scott R. Brown, Tracy L. Bornman, Tracey S. Truitt, Michael B. Hurd, Catherine B. Richardson, Michael Elbein, Joan Optican Herman, David
Thomas H. Van Hoozer, Warren N. Williams, Stephen HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 Mastin Blvd.Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Sanitary apparatus and installations, namely bathtubs, bidets, hot tubs, hot water heaters, hot water tanks, kitchen sinks, lavatories, lavatory bowls, lavatory seats, portable toilets, portable urinals for outdoor activities, showers, sinks, sitz baths, toilet bowls, toilet seats, toilet tanks, toilets, urinals, water closets, whirlpool baths, whirlpools; pipes being parts of sanitary facilities; parts of sanitary installations, namely, wash-hand basins; bathtubs; plumbing fittings, namely, traps for sanitary installations; manually operated air admittance valves for use in ventilating plumbing and sewer systems; decompression devices for drainage systems, namely decompression valves for absorbing air pressure peaks in plumbing and sewer systems; component parts for the aforementioned goods therefor namely, plastic adaptors and couplers for coupling the aforementioned goods, and flexible cylindrical rubber replacement pipes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber, gutta-percha, gum for use in the manufacture of flexible pipes, pipe junctions, watertight rings, waterproof packings, all for use in plumbing and sewer systems; asbestos boards, mica and goods made of these materials, namely, packings for use in plumbing and sewer systems; joint packing for plumbing pipes; water-tight rings for plumbing pipes; waterproof packings for plumbing pipes; jointing mastics, namely, pipe joint sealant; flexible non-metal pipes; non-metal pipe junctions for plumbing pipes; reinforcing materials for pipes, namely, non-metal pipe couplings and joints | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |