Drawing for WALDRICH COBURG

USPTO serial 79018425

WALDRICH COBURG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3218227Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 2007
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with WALDRICH COBURG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer A. Van Kirk

Jennifer A. Van Kirk Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools, namely milling machines for cubical workpiece machining, vertical turning machines, way grinding machines, rail grinding machines, crankshaft segment milling machines, roll corrugate grindersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 8, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 8, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 1, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 14, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 6, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance