Drawing for STORCHENMÜHLE

USPTO serial 79018496

STORCHENMÜHLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171752Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STORCHENMÜHLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell A. Tuchman

MITCHELL A TUCHMAN WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 13069RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Child restraint systems for vehicles, namely, safety seats for children, safety belts and paddings; baby strollers and pramsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Wooden bars and grids in the nature of safety gates for temporary mounting on door frames to prevent access by children; furniture, namely, wooden playpens, wooden chairs, wooden chair and table sets, and bedsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
028Gymnastic and sporting goods, namely, children's swings and safety harnesses attached theretoSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 7, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 7, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 27, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 8, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance