USPTO serial 79018523
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MARSAN GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MARSAN GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes, dietetic food preparations adapted for medical purposes; Food for babies; Medicinal herb extracts and herbal drinks for medicinal purposes, herb mixtures and concentrates for medical purposes; medicinal herb teas, slimming teas, Ginseng teas all for medical purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, artificial coffee, mocha coffee, coffee based substitutes, coffee or cocoa based beverages; tapioca, sago; pasta, ravioli, home made pasta; bread, pide, in the nature of Turkish style calzone, pizza, lahmacun namely, Turkish style pizza; biscuits, crackers, waffles, cakes, tarts, loaf cakes; baklava traditional Turkish dessert, söbiyet namely, a baklava-like sweet pastry, tulumba tatlisi namely, a syrup-soaked pastry, bülbül yuvasi, namely, a baklava-like pastry; puddings, kazandibi namely, a pudding slightly burnt on the bottom, sütlac, namely a rice pudding, sup namely, a chocolate pudding, muhallebi, namely a Turkish-style pudding; asure namely, a fruit and nut pudding; honey, royal fruit jelly, propolis; food flavorings; yeasts, baking-powder, vanilla; all kinds of flour, processed semolina, corn starch; granulated sugar, cubed sugar, powdered sugar; teas, ice teas; confectionery for baking, Turkish delight, halvah, pismaniye namely, a Turkish-style cotton candy, frozen yogurt and frozen yogurt confectionary, chocolates, chocolate products, namely chocolate candies, chocolate covered nuts, and chocolate-based ready-to-eat food; chocolate and sugar covered products, namely, chocolate and sugar toppings; chocolate and sugar products, namely Christmas tree decorations; chocolate based beverages; chewing gums; ice creams, edible ices; salt; rice, pounded wheat, keskek namely, a dish cooked with pounded meat and wheat, coarsely ground wheat, malt for foods; snacks made from flour, cereal, popcorn, corn flakes, oatmeal, breakfast cereals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |