USPTO serial 79018565
STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3666843Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
I-20041 AGRATE BRIANZA (MILANO), IT
Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
I-20041 AGRATE BRIANZA (MILANO), IT
Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
I-20041 AGRATE BRIANZA (MILANO), IT
Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS [ ; JELLIES, JAMS, COMPOTES; EGGS, MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ COFFEE, ] TEA, [ COCOA, SUGAR, ] RICE [, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE] ; FLOURS AND CEREAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, MIXES FOR MAKING PIZZA, SPECIAL PASTES MADE OF CURRY AND ALMOND, FARINACEOUS PASTES AND FARINACEOUS PATTIES FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION; BISCUITS, CAKES; PASTRIES; [ AND CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED CANDY, ALMOND CANDY, BOILED SUGAR CANDY, BUBBLE GUM, CHEWING GUM; ] EDIBLE ICE; [ HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING POWDER; ] SALT, MUSTARD; SPICES [; ICE FOR REFRESHMENT ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | [ FRESH WHITE POTATOES, FRESH SWEET POTATOES, FRESH CARROTS, FRESH CABBAGE, FRESH ARTICHOKES, FRESH TOMATOES, FRESH ONIONS, FRESH BEANS, FRESH MUSHROOMS, DRIED PLANTS FOR DECORATION; AND MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS; FRUIT BEVERAGES AND FRUIT JUICES; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS ] | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by STAR STABILIMENTO ALIMENTARE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named STAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |