USPTO serial 79018572
TENAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3527644Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2008
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TENAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-23897 VIGANO' (LECCO), IT
IT
IT
CH
NL
Baltimore, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC901 New York Avenue, N.W.Suite 900 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic construction and building materials, namely, [ hardwood, decking, wood and plastic wood substitute boards, soffits, fascia, logs, posts, ] [ plastic pipe supports, ] [ plastic webbing material used to reinforce bituminous water proofing sheets, ] grids, and meshes; [ non-metallic geotextiles for reinforcement of soil; non-metallic geotextiles for stabilization of soil; plastic wallboards; ] [ plastic boundary marking posts; ] [ plastic tiles; ] geotextiles in the nature of non-metallic meshes for [ filtration, ] separation and drainage of soil [ ; non-metallic stabilizing geotextiles to facilitate the growth of grass and turf in soil, sand and other growing media; non-metallic construction pipes, namely, sewer pipes, water pipes, rigid polypropylene pipes used in geothermal heating and cooling systems, ceramic drain pipes, clay pipes; Concrete drainage structures, namely, trench or storm manholes; non-metallic gutter guards ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Commercial nets; commercial nets completely or substantially of plastic material; commercial extruded plastic nets; [ commercial laminated nets; commercial laminated nets in the form of sheets and/or containing fabrics; ] one-way stretched commercial plastic nets; two-way stretched commercial plastic nets; commercial plastic nets, namely, commercial plastic nets for fencing, gardening, horticulture, agriculture, aviculture, pisciculture and packing; commercial nets and tarpaulins for cultivation protection, cultivation defense and cultivation growth, namely, commercial nets and tarpaulins for shading, windbreaks, anti-hail, anti-aphid, for pollination, for protection against birds, for mulching, for use as thermo-reflecting screens, to promote growth of cultivation, for creepers; commercial support nets for floriculture and horticulture; commercial nets for harvesting and drying of agricultural products, for packing and transportation of plants, for flower picking and production of grass carpets; commercial packaging nets, namely, nets for protection of bottles or mechanical parts of machines; commercial separation nets for packing; [ commercial protection and polyester plastic packing nets for furnishing articles, for packaging of toys, bottles and for packaging of food products; ] commercial nets for plant wrapping; commercial nets for packing of industrial articles such as pipes and panels; [ tarpaulins, namely, biodegradable fleeces for protection and against weeds; protection tarpaulins for plants; horticulture bags and sacks, namely, bags and sacks made of woven synthetic or natural fibers or plastic materials, all for use in growing any type of plant, shrub or tree; tents and awnings; ] non-metallic commercial nets, namely, non-metallic nets for filtration, separation and drainage; commercial nets for filtering; commercial dockyard nets; commercial nets for reinforcement; commercial protection nets, namely, nets for crop protection and plant protection; commercial covering nets for scaffolding; commercial nets for signaling piping systems for gas, water, electricity and telephony | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TENAX S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TENAX S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TENAX S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SAC Industriale SA
- Other trademarks owned by Tenax International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Tenax Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named TENAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |