Drawing for ATEC

USPTO serial 79018690

ATEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283185Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ATEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*

Plus Government fees of $2,600

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeff Goehring

Jeff Goehring Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the crushing, grinding, sizing, classifying and separating of minerals and cement; machines to separate minerals and cement between coarse and fine powder fractions with supporting air or gas with the aid of centrifugal force; machines to grind cement and to process fuelsACTIVE—
035Commercial consulting regarding the planning of crushing, grinding, sizing, classifying and separating devices and plants, in particular to separate substances from liquid or gaseous media by centrifugal force, and with cyclonesACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of crushing, grinding, sizing, classifying and separating devices and plants and of devices and plants to separate substances between coarse and fine powder fractions with supporting air or gas with the aid of centrifugal equipmentACTIVE—
042Technical planning and optimization consultancy of the construction and technical function of crushing, grinding, sizing, classifying and separating devices and plants and of devices and plants to separate substances between coarse and fine powder fractions with supporting air or gas with the aid of centrifugal equipment; technical planning consultancy of machines, devices and plants in the sense of an improvement of the environmental balance and reduction of costs and emissionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 14, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 30, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 31, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jul 30, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 14, 2013NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 14, 201315AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jun 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2013E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance