CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for QRS

USPTO serial 79018729

QRS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QRS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, magnetic field therapy apparatus and light and radiation apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
016Printed matter, namely, in the field of magnetic field therapy; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of magnetic field therapy; books in the field of magnetic field therapy; and printed periodicals in the field of magnetic field therapySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Medical services; hygienic care for human beings or animals; magnetic field therapy; physical therapy and electrotherapeutic treatments; medical clinics; and physiotherapySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance