Drawing for P PICARD

USPTO serial 79018780

P PICARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318428Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P PICARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff

KATRIN LEWERTOFF Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Key rings of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
018Bag-maker products of leather, plastic and fabric, namely handbags for women, shoulder bags, small evening clutch bags, small bags for men, all-purpose carrying for children, tote bags for professional activities, traveling bags and luggage trunks, hold-all bags, namely, all-purpose carrying bags, automobile travel bags, travel bags for planes; briefcases; small leather goods, namely purses, wallets; calling card casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 31, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 31, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 22, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 22, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 31, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 14, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 8, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance