Drawing for GIANNINI

USPTO serial 79018800

GIANNINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220294Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with GIANNINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Large forks; spoons; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; hand-operated pasta cutters; table cutlery made of stainless steel; nutcrackersACTIVE
021Kitchen implements made of stainless steel, namely, skimmers, turners for frying and ice, dish drying racks, ladle holders, graters, butter curlers, bar implements made of stainless steel, namely, cocktail shakers, cooling buckets for wine, bottle openers; sundae cups, saucers, tableware made of stainless steel, namely, serving platters, bowls, serving tongs; cruet stands not of precious metal, small cheese dishes, salt shakers, toothpick holders, trays, bread and fruit baskets, finger bowls, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, bottle drip mats, stew-pans, non-electric pressure cookersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 12, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 5, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 17, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 3, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 3, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 3, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 19, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance