USPTO serial 79018807
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ATASAY KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys; goods made of precious metals or coated therewith, namely, amulets, badges, jewelry boxes, decorative boxes, bracelets, brooches, belt buckles, watchstrap buckles, candlesticks, cigarette cases, coins, earrings, hat ornaments, ingots, jewel cases, key rings, match boxes, medals, necklaces, needles, ornamental pins, purses, shoe ornaments, silver ornaments, watch springs, straps for wristwatches, tie pins, tobacco jars, wristwatches; jewelry, precious stones, diamonds; horological and chronometric instruments; ashtrays of precious metal for smokers, cigar boxes of precious metal; tie clips, cups of precious metal; statuette figurines of precious metal; household containers of precious metal; household utensils of precious metal, namely, kitchen containers, boxes of precious metal for sweetmeats, non-electric coffeepots of precious metal, cruets, dishes, egg cups, epergnes, flasks, goblets, jugs, napkin holders, napkin rings, oil cruets, pepper pots, saucers, silver plates, soup bowls, sugar bowls, tea caddies, tea infusers, tea services, tea strainers, urns, and vases of precious metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |