USPTO serial 79018810
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EKSIT JEAN TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, underwear, overcoats, coats, raincoats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, jerseys, waistcoats, shirt, t-shirts, sweat shirts, pullovers, cardigans, skirts, blouses, sweaters, shorts, Bermuda shorts, overalls, undershirts, underpants, panties, brassieres, body suits, corsets, dressing gowns, nightgowns, wedding dresses, working overalls, school aprons, knitwear in the nature of sweaters, jean jackets, leather jackets, casual pants, sport shirts, bathing suits and swimwear, beach clothes in the nature of shorts, pajamas, gloves, socks; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, half boots, rain boots, ski boots, gymnastic shoes, sandals, slippers, lace boots, sports shoes, shoe parts, namely, heel pieces, heels, footwear uppers; head wear, namely, hats, berets, caps, bandanas, headbands | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |