USPTO serial 79018891
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Natland
SUSAN M. NATLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | [ Material for repairing teeth and for dental crowns and bridges; materials for odontological and dental implant systems, namely, dental material for shaping and constructing dental crowns; porcelain, titanium, metal alloys, ceramic materials, precious metal material for creating artificial replacement teeth and other biocompatible material, namely, zirconia, for dental restorations and filling teeth; dental wax ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | [ Surgical, medical and ] odontological implants comprising artificial material; [ orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic joint implants, dental crowns and bridges; ] instruments and apparatus for reconstruction and rehabilitation within the odontological [, medical, orthopaedic and surgical ] fields, namely, dental drills, dental picks and dental screw drivers; [ surgical, medical and ] odontological instruments and apparatus for dental surgery; artificial [ joints, ] teeth, [ eyes, limbs ] and other artificial prosthesis, namely, protective caps for teeth; parts and fittings for all aforesaid goods, namely, impression copings, abutments, dental and orthopaedic screws and guide pins | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |