Drawing for N

USPTO serial 79018912

N

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3418464Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2008
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with N?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Edible oils and fats; milk products excluding ice cream; ice milk and frozen yogurt; fresh, chilled, or frozen meat for human consumption; eggs; edible seafood; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; processed meat products, namely, sausages, hams and bacon; processed fish products, namely, canned fish, crab shellfish, clam and caviar; Kamaboko, namely, steamed or toasted cakes of fish paste; processed vegetables and fruits; Abura-age, namely, fried tofu pieces; Kohri-dofu, namely, freeze-dried tofu pieces; Konnyaku, namely, jelly made from devil's tongue root; soy milk; Natto, namely, fermented soybeans; processed eggs; ] soup mixes; Ochazuke-nori, namely, dried flakes of edible laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water [ ; raw pulses, namely, processed edible seeds ]ACTIVE—
030[ Meat tenderizers for household purposes; tea, coffee and cocoa; ice; confectionery, namely, cookies and pancakes; Shiruko, namely, a dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; instant Shiruko, namely, an instant dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; rice crackers; bread and buns; ] [ seasonings; ] [ spices; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; unroasted unprocessed coffee; ] [ cereal preparations, namely, dried cooked-rice ] [ ; instant Chinese noodles; almond paste; Gyoza, namely, cooked Chinese stuffed dumplings; sandwiches; Shumai, namely, cooked Chinese steamed dumplings; sushi; Takoyaki, namely, fried balls of batter mixed with small pieces of octopus; Niku-manjuh, namely, steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; prepared hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; prepared hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; yeast powder; Koji, namely, fermenting malted rice; yeast; baking powder; instant confectionery mixes, namely, instant cake mixes; instant pancake mixes; husked rice; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; curry mixes; ] Furi-kake, namely, seasoned powder made mainly from seaweed, sesame, and dried egg, for sprinkling on riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 11, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 11, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance