USPTO serial 79018912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian B. Darville
Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Edible oils and fats; milk products excluding ice cream; ice milk and frozen yogurt; fresh, chilled, or frozen meat for human consumption; eggs; edible seafood; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; processed meat products, namely, sausages, hams and bacon; processed fish products, namely, canned fish, crab shellfish, clam and caviar; Kamaboko, namely, steamed or toasted cakes of fish paste; processed vegetables and fruits; Abura-age, namely, fried tofu pieces; Kohri-dofu, namely, freeze-dried tofu pieces; Konnyaku, namely, jelly made from devil's tongue root; soy milk; Natto, namely, fermented soybeans; processed eggs; ] soup mixes; Ochazuke-nori, namely, dried flakes of edible laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water [ ; raw pulses, namely, processed edible seeds ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Meat tenderizers for household purposes; tea, coffee and cocoa; ice; confectionery, namely, cookies and pancakes; Shiruko, namely, a dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; instant Shiruko, namely, an instant dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; rice crackers; bread and buns; ] [ seasonings; ] [ spices; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; unroasted unprocessed coffee; ] [ cereal preparations, namely, dried cooked-rice ] [ ; instant Chinese noodles; almond paste; Gyoza, namely, cooked Chinese stuffed dumplings; sandwiches; Shumai, namely, cooked Chinese steamed dumplings; sushi; Takoyaki, namely, fried balls of batter mixed with small pieces of octopus; Niku-manjuh, namely, steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; prepared hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; prepared hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; yeast powder; Koji, namely, fermenting malted rice; yeast; baking powder; instant confectionery mixes, namely, instant cake mixes; instant pancake mixes; husked rice; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; curry mixes; ] Furi-kake, namely, seasoned powder made mainly from seaweed, sesame, and dried egg, for sprinkling on rice | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |