Drawing for N

USPTO serial 79018912

N

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3418464Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2008
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with N?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Edible oils and fats; milk products excluding ice cream; ice milk and frozen yogurt; fresh, chilled, or frozen meat for human consumption; eggs; edible seafood; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; processed meat products, namely, sausages, hams and bacon; processed fish products, namely, canned fish, crab shellfish, clam and caviar; Kamaboko, namely, steamed or toasted cakes of fish paste; processed vegetables and fruits; Abura-age, namely, fried tofu pieces; Kohri-dofu, namely, freeze-dried tofu pieces; Konnyaku, namely, jelly made from devil's tongue root; soy milk; Natto, namely, fermented soybeans; processed eggs; ] soup mixes; Ochazuke-nori, namely, dried flakes of edible laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water [ ; raw pulses, namely, processed edible seeds ]ACTIVE
030[ Meat tenderizers for household purposes; tea, coffee and cocoa; ice; confectionery, namely, cookies and pancakes; Shiruko, namely, a dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; instant Shiruko, namely, an instant dessert sweet soup of Azuki-bean flour; rice crackers; bread and buns; ] [ seasonings; ] [ spices; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; unroasted unprocessed coffee; ] [ cereal preparations, namely, dried cooked-rice ] [ ; instant Chinese noodles; almond paste; Gyoza, namely, cooked Chinese stuffed dumplings; sandwiches; Shumai, namely, cooked Chinese steamed dumplings; sushi; Takoyaki, namely, fried balls of batter mixed with small pieces of octopus; Niku-manjuh, namely, steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; prepared hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; prepared hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; yeast powder; Koji, namely, fermenting malted rice; yeast; baking powder; instant confectionery mixes, namely, instant cake mixes; instant pancake mixes; husked rice; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; curry mixes; ] Furi-kake, namely, seasoned powder made mainly from seaweed, sesame, and dried egg, for sprinkling on riceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 11, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 11, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 26, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 26, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 11, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 11, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance