USPTO serial 79018921
AKSU VITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3181210Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2006
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AKSU VITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Küçükçekmece-Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Küçükçekmece-Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Küçükçekmece-Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKSUVITAL GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Küçükçekmece-Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT AND JEREMY CRAFT
JOHN S EGBERT & JEREMY CRAFT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, artificial coffee, vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes, cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages; tapioca, sago; macaroni, ravioli, vermicelli, bakery products; pastries; flour-based products, namely, flour-based chips, pasta, cakes; dough products, namely, bread dough, cake dough; biscuits, waffles, crackers; tarts, cakes, bread, pizzas, sandwiches; puddings; ready cake mixes, baking dough, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, honey, royal jelly for human consumption, propolis for human consumption; candy, namely, Turkish delight; flour, semolina and starch for food; chewing gum not for medical purposes; ice cream, ice, edible fruit ices; salt; rice; bulgar wheat, namely, boiled and pounded wheat; snacks and crisps made of flour and cereals, corn flakes, oatmeal, breakfast cereals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL DOGAL ÜRÜNLER GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKSUVITAL GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AKSU VITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |