Drawing for EXPRESS YOURSELF

USPTO serial 79019025

EXPRESS YOURSELF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499206Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 9, 2008
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESS YOURSELF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebeccah Gan

Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 1200Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cups; cups for coffee; cups for drinking chocolates; lids for cups; coffee brewers, non-electric; non-paper coffee filters being part of non-electric coffee makers; coffee grinders, hand-operated; coffee makers, non-electric; coffee making machines, non-electric; coffee mills, hand-operated; coffee percolators, non-electric; coffee pots, non-electric and not of precious metal; coffee services NOT OF PRECIOUS METALSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 9, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 17, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 10, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 10, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 23, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Feb 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 11, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance