Drawing for TWIN-AF-MAG

USPTO serial 79019030

TWIN-AF-MAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298183Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWIN-AF-MAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leon Medzhibovsky

WILLI SCHICKEDANZ LANGENER STRASSE 68OFFENBACH FED REP, 63073GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of mechanical vacuum coating machines in the nature of devices for cathode sputtering in the reactive and metallic mode, namely, cathodes being parts of vacuum tubes, targets, vacuum chambers and electrical machines for carrying out a sputter processSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 2, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 31, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 22, 2007NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance