Drawing for EKRA

USPTO serial 79019058

EKRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253887Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EKRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Faber

ROBERT C. FABER Ostrolenk Faber LLP845 Third Avenue8th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Printing machines, namely screen printing machines, stencil printing machines and thick-film machines for printing materials on work pieces; wafer bumping machines; print heads for printing machines aforementioned; structural parts of the above goods; squeegees with steel blades for screen printing or for stencil printing for printing machines aforementioned; upright squeegees with steel blades for printing machines aforementioned; parts of the above squeegees with steel blades, namely squeegees with steel blades heads for printing machines aforementionedACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 11, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 21, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 21, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 1, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 26, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 6, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 30, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jul 30, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 21, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Dec 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 18, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance