Drawing for GN SMART CORD

USPTO serial 79019076

GN SMART CORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3286521Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2007
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GN SMART CORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville, Esq.

Anna W. Manville, Esq. Arnold & Porter LLP500 Twelfth Street, NWIP DOCKETINGWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound, namely, loudspeakers, microphones, telephones and headsets for telephonesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 5, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 5, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 4, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 7, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 28, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 7, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance