USPTO serial 79019097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DE
DE
DE
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Walker
Patricia A. Walker Walker & Jocke Co., LPA231 South BroadwayMedina, OH 44256-2601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in industry, namely, adjuvants for the manual and mechanical cleaning and maintenance of motor vehicles, adjuvants for partial and preparatory industrial cleaning, adjuvants for water treatment, namely, coagulum, flocking agents, anti-foaming agents, water conditioners; unprocessed artificial resins for industry, namely production of chemicals, paints, glues and polymers; unprocessed plastics; fertilizers; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering and soldering preparations, namely, tempering chemicals for use in metal working or soldering; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning substances, namely, tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather; adhesives for general industrial use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | [ Paints, varnishes, lacquers; rust preservatives in the nature of a coating; wood preservatives, colorants for use in the manufacture of paint; mordants for use in industry, namely, for painting, printing and dipping; raw natural resins for use in the manufacture of resins and for general industrial use; metal in foil and powder for painters, decorators, printers and artists ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Industrial oils and greases, namely, industrial lubricants, all purpose lubricants for use in the automobile industry, machines and appliances; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |