Drawing for FAVELA CHIC

USPTO serial 79019109

FAVELA CHIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275343Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAVELA CHIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Cultural activities, namely, organizing community cultural events; production of television shows, theatrical booking agencies, rental of phonograph recordings; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, namely, arranging of exhibitionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Services for providing food and drink, namely, restaurant servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Dec 12, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 23, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 20, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance