USPTO serial 79019111
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NL-5048 AN TILBURG, NL
NL-5048 AN TILBURG, NL
NL-5048 AN TILBURG, NL
NL-5048 AN TILBURG, NL
NL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | common metals and their alloys, namely, steel and its alloys, brass and its alloys, copper and its alloys, titanium and its alloys; building materials of metal, namely, metal soffits, metal cladding; transportable buildings made of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; metal ironmongery and small items of metal hardware for locksmithing applications, namely, pins, deadbolts, lock rings and keys, metal strap-hinges and closures for doors, windows and viewing windows for use in industrial machinery; metal screws, metal nuts, metal bolts, metal plugs, metal snap rings, metal clamping plates, metal cotter pins and ball lock pins, threaded metal rods, metal fastening inserts, namely, metal concrete inserts, metal expansion shields, metal wedge anchors, metal drilling anchors and metal safety anchors, metal frame fixings in the nature of brackets and anchors, metal cavity fixings in the nature of brackets, metal toggle plugs, metal wall plugs, metal clamps, metal beam clips, metal rope clips, metal chain shackles, metal gate hooks, metal u-bolts, metal hose clamps, metal washers for spacing or securement of fasteners, metal push-in caps for tubing ends, metal pegs, nails, metal rivets, metal cramps, wires, metal wattle for use in building construction, wire mesh, metal brake cable and fence tensioners, binding screws of metal for cables; metal crank handles in the form of bars and non-plasticized rings, metal chains, metal split pins, belt tensioners of metal, plastic-coated, zinc-coated metal poles in pipe form; plastic-coated metal garden doors, metal pipes, metal flanges and bushings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | hand-operated tools and implements, namely, saws, shears, wrenches, putty knives, drills, general purpose hand grinders for use in woodworking and metalworking, axes, chisels, dies, hammers, shovels, pliers, scissors, punches, pipe cutters, rasps, reamers, scrapers, sharpening wheels, socket wrenches, socket spanners and squares; gardening tools, namely, earth drills, prune saws, rakes, and spades | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | non-metallic fastening materials, namely, non-metallic strap hinges, non-metal screws, non-metal nuts, non-metal bolts, non-metal plugs in the nature of fillings for holes or openings, non-metal snap rings, non-metal clamping plates, non-metal cotter pins and ball lock pins, non-metal and non-paper closures for doors, windows and for use in securing latches in industrial machinery; non-metal and non-paper closures for containers; binding screws not of metal for cables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |