USPTO serial 79019115
KTM POWERWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KTM POWERWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Clothing for protection for motorcyclists for protection against accidents and fire, namely, gloves and shoes; protective helmets; knee and elbow pads for protection against accident and fire; anti-glare motorcycle goggles; and sunglasses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo-shirts, sweatshirts, blousons, jackets, pullovers, shirts, parkas, trousers, overalls, gloves, gloves for motorcyclists, underwear, socks and clothing for motorcyclists, namely, pants, coats, overalls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 16, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |